Not known Facts About 800x
Not known Facts About 800x
Blog Article
The factor with 800x to come alive is compression, with light bullets which will't compress A great deal into the situation I Significantly want PP, LS 572 to 800x. I recover figures and accuracy in the non 800x powders. With heavier bullets during the 240g up to about 300g is the place 800x shines.
Over and under that optimum you will notice powder residue and unwanted performance. This appears to be genuine for 800X, as it's for virtually any powder.
Ended up with all 10 back. You couldn't gentle that powder that has a match. Never ever carried A further keg til the working day i offered the small business. Luckily the distributor acquired them back again from me.
I just don't forget hitting a scenario expansion figure that was close to my max in a cost perfectly down below e-book max, but after cautiously pushing on, the growth looked as if it would lessen a tiny bit then boost once more. Has any individual else had very similar success?
Prolly perform OK in just one stage. I usually bumped the take care of a few situations on my old Texan single phase. Beloved it on peppy 12g rounds again then.
The versatility made available from the addition of Bluetooth is excellent, significantly if you are still looking ahead to the Xbox One to support track record audio.
I have utilised 800x in 10mm and 45acp with excellent results. The most significant dilemma I discovered with it's the dimension of your flakes. Just isn't really pleasant with most powder measures.
This is without doubt one of the far more soiled powders in 9 MM. On the other hand it's Among the most correct, to this point, in our tests. it wholly stunned us. OK we really have to say this right this moment. We do not like the Hodgdon load data. We fee it reduced comparatively versus other important firms, not all. How come we price it reduced? Evaluate it. The loads are not even to SAAMI specification for strain, they are much lessen. What is the position? Is Hodgdon indicating its perilous to exceed ~32,000 PSI force in 9MM in guns rated to simply deal with 38,five hundred PSI?
Talking of steel, back in the ninety's I made use of many 800x in metal shot loads utilizing AA hulls. I shot many ducks and a few geese also. I just made use of many of it to load up some 28 gauge loads for my son. I may have to test some in pistol masses as well.
I understand speer used to record some warmish 38 Particular loads for 800x, then pulled them. I by no means heard why.
I can think that the more substantial flakes You should not settle in addition during the scaled-down diameter bushings, but simultaneously I have experienced no issues throwing equivalent weights of 800X via a Lyman 55 or Dillon measure when loading 800X for handgun cartridges.
TDC20 reported: I have a theory about what is going on with the light (135gr) bullets and 800-X. About 6 months in 800x the past, I had a 50 percent-baked concept to acquire a method to shoot 22 cal air rifle pellets from my .22 LR (I do not individual an airgun now). The focus on was destined to be starlings off the backyard bird feeder. In any case, I pulled some bullets from some low-priced 22 ammo, dumped the powder, then loaded 1gr of your swiftest powder I've readily available, which is Bullseye. The strategy was to chrono the velocity and perform around about 1000fps. The sole dilemma was that I was only ready to get a person outside of about ten rds to truly burn off the powder and accelerate the pellet out in the barrel at a decent velocity. On the rest, only the rimfire primer burned, leaving a mess of unburnt Bullseye in the barrel. The situation is the fact smokeless powders burn off rapidly beneath intensive stress, as may be observed by lighting a few grains of powder without any 800X powder stress.
The more substantial long lasting cavity might lead to speedier blood reduction. Though this kind of an edge Obviously exists, its importance can't be quantified".
This can be an older thread, you may not receive a response, and will be reviving an outdated thread. You should take into account making a new thread.