Getting My h4831sc load data To Work
Getting My h4831sc load data To Work
Blog Article
I gave up on it and went to other powder if the new powder was creating a lot more strain and was slower when compared to the old stuff. I don't don't forget if I even tried out frequent h4831 or not; I am wondering not.
H4831 will operate within the Swift although not authentic effectively. You can hardly ever have the pressures you may need for consistency With all the .223. 760, or H414 will probably be much better but for many cause I ain't the largest fan of most ball powders.
What is the primary difference? Compression. With no extreme/significant compression related to the prolonged grain 7828, the tension curve was altered along with the load fell aside.
Caution using SC or SSC developed loads with long Lower, back off and function up. Use safe loading techniques.
In any case, I realized The 2 kilos of H4831SC applied the same data, but I didn't know no matter if there was nearly anything unique amongst a pound of powder labeled "Intense" and one not so labeled. A simply call to Hodgdon confirmed which they had been in truth equivalent and the one variation was The emblem around the label.
I know, rough instances. H4831SC will definitely operate, I just failed to like the case density when loaded extended. I don't recall powder demand off the highest of my head but I had been launching a Berger 168gr VLD at three,000fps which happens to be where I generally intention to generally be. In the circumstance employing what you have (and what I should have done) I would get started with the top with the bearing surface from the bullet correct in the shoulder/neck junction, and flirt with extending seating depths from there h4831sc load data as you find a velocity node.
i've utilized the two and used the very same prices and also have not been capable of inform any noticable variations with performance. the SC Variation meters somewhat smoother is about all. any remarks??
Although this is probably correct, there is a lot a lot more to it than simply not blowing oneself up. He could not strike prairie pet dogs past about one hundred fifty yards, so I am guessing that inconsistent combustion was not doing anything h4831sc at all favorable for his grouping skill with those loads.
You might either: one) Continue on and also have the firearm(s) shown under instantly removed from your shopping cart:
You may have to h4831sc help make a couple of additional posts to get cleared to perform PM's. Once you reach that position I'd submit during the classified reloading segment to discover if anyone is near you for the trade. Simply click to extend...
As to the 4831 vs 4831SC, They are really the identical/equivalent powder cept for grain size. Load data is interchangeable.
Like Everybody mentioned, the SC stands for “limited Slice” and is particularly a bit much easier to meter. Will make you question why they would still make the normal a single.
Many of the old Lyman data just detailed IMR 4831, which was surplus military services powder and now newer mfg as H4831.
If I have a pound or two of the powder and receive extra of the same, only a different lot number, I'll combine them all up in order that I have a homogeneous batch of powder with which to operate.